Key Skills

Qualitative Coding

Thematic Analysis

Data Analysis (R Programming)

Data Visualization

Presentation Design

  • Bacon
  • Chicken nuggets
  • Chicken tenders
  • Hamburgers
  • Hot dogs
  • Appearance
  • Taste
  • Smell
  • Texture
  • Product specific categories (e.g. “breading” for chicken nuggets)
  • Motivations for switching to a plant-based diet (e.g. environmental)
  • Favorite/least favorite products
  • Why they liked/disliked products
  • Taste, smell, texture, appearance
  • If they’d buy any of the products sampled
    • How much they would pay
  • Used R programming to perform statistical analysis on close-ended survey data (Likert and semantic differential scales) for over 500 participants.
  • Identified best products, outliers, consistent poor performers, etc. overall and for specific categories (e.g. “appearance”).
  • The survey contained a number of open-ended questions, such as “What most about the appearance did you like” or “dislike” for each product.
  • A “like” and “dislike” open-ended question was included for each overall section on the survey (taste, smell, texture, appearance)
    • I developed inductive codebooks for each product’s open-ended questions in order to extract and analyze themes from qualitative data.
      • I coded over 9000 open-ended survey responses.
    • After coding, I translated this into usable numbers to include in graphs/charts to quantitatively reflect participants’ open-ended attitudes and opinions.
Example of part of codebook I developed for chicken nuggets
  • I used close-ended and open-ended survey data to uncover insights about people’s preferences, attitudes, and opinions towards each plant-based meat product.
  • Analyzed insights between categories for a specific meat product and across all five products.
  • I created five comprehensive slide decks that housed all relevant quantitative information for each product
  • Each slide deck included:
    • Pictures of all plant-based and real-meat products
    • Summary of methodology
    • Overview of all questions and question types use
    • Summary of overall findings
    • Insights about each category (taste, appearance, smell, etc.)
    • Detailed findings from data, including graphs/charts showcasing performance of each product tested
    • Graphs for open-ended results per product
Slide deck title page (client name removed)
Example of graph
  1. Plant-based meat is not necessarily worse
    • Many plant-based meat products performed better than the real meat product in certain categories
  2. Taste is not the only factor
    • Taste, while important, is not always the most important factor for plant-based meat products.
      • Just tasting good overall, rather than tasting exactly like meat, was a big factor for certain products.
  3. A willingness for plant-based meat
    • Most participants showed at least some willingness to incorporate plant-based meat into their diets.
    • However, for many this came with significant obstacles, some of which were not necessarily anticipated going into this study.